Replies to post #310500 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Poo28]

Legally Lucia caused remand had everything to do with the outcome of the DBMM AP. The name of the Company is in a SCOTUS order. 


Repeat: DBMM is contained in the companies listing of the remand order. A legal document.


Likewise, DBMM did not appeal anything. A remand vacated the order and SCOTUS ordered no citation of the remanded order. That is very different from an appeal. A remand vacated the earlier order and started all over. That was crucial to DBMM.Maranda Fritz capitalized on it as foundational. 


Your opinion is not what the Court Papers stated. I prefer documentation and facts not opinions. This is why I always suggest shareholders do their own due diligence.

[Westcoastplaya]

That’s totally wrong.

Quote “Everyone knows about Lucia and the Appointments Clause. That gave DBMM a reason to appeal the original ruling by the SEC ALJ”

That ruling was vacated and did not need to be appealed. It’s FALSE to say otherwise.

[Westcoastplaya]

Bullshit! It was remanded not appealed.