InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

THall

06/30/23 12:14 PM

#309459 RE: twainsname #309455

How exactly are those billions of imaginary naked shorts going to cover with only 729 million shares outstanding? DO you really think that the Treasury is going to issue more shares so these make believe shorts can cover?

The entire billion in naked shorts theory is idiotic at best. Why would anyone who naked short a stock cover if they have gone unnoticed? If there is no FTD then those shorts are not even known to exist. SMH
icon url

MU_Redskin1

06/30/23 12:43 PM

#309481 RE: twainsname #309455

DBOOOOOOOOM, school ‘em up champ! Facts!

Your opinion is that there are no naked shorts. My opinion backed up by (for example) high irregular volume over years. (What was it, 19billion traded on a sub billion float?) is that man…those shorts are going to be so hurt and a lot will probably have to sell off assets to cover their short position because they assumed $dbmm would be revoked and instead they won and were reinstated. And, given the history and the win and after win, longs are just gonna hold for gold while the shorts are crying into their ramen noodles. :)


Here is a post to support your comments: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170724228

Exactly ... Load ‘em cheap, lock ‘em GTC and Hold for MOASS Gold! ;-)

GLTA DBMM 2.0!

Cheers, Red