Thanks, Meghan. I'm thinking that maybe the proposed rule change language for Violation of Privacy could include something more specific along the lines of your language:
"Unless a poster outright says, “I am [insert name here]” publicly, their identity is to remain wholly understood as whatever their alias is on the boards."
Unless a poster outright says, “I am [insert name here]” publicly, their identity is to remain wholly understood as whatever their alias is on the boards.
A surprising number of company insiders have posted here over the years. AND they've had no compunctions about identifying themselves. I've always found that bizarre, but it can be fun.