Please don’t forget, a first responder on scene that night published his comments in a national fire journal publication stating, in his comments to the published article, that it appeared to be “economic arson” in his opinion. I had a link way back when, if I recall all of this accurately (it’s late). So I am going by my observations and interpretations of the photos published BEFORE the fire, and do not disagree, in my opinion, what one first responder noted in his comments in that published article, inclusive of comments.
The fire did not surprise me at all, in my opinion. I wonder what UtterlyDumb thought about it…
This is just my opinion, the reader may disagree