Oh listen, the crickets are chirping! 'Predatory lending' you claim, yet never a mention of it before. Until some 'smart' idea filtered that one down. LOL.
Yeah, it's all Auctus, and Duffy the Fluffy and his Xeriant team all, got taken.
Hey, wasn't Alfred Rapetti, fantastic wonderful financial architect, on the Xeriant Advisory Board? Wasn't Alfred Rapetti around to advise and inform the rest of Xeriant's decision makers and Duffy The Fluffy about this "predatory lending"?
It's not "predatory lending" that is of issue by the SEC. The "predatory lending" claim is misleading and scammy.
It is clear that claim of Auctus as Xeriant's "predatory lender" is just another new 'smart' fabrication' that the minion skanks follow to re-tell and repeat and repeat and repeat to make something of nothing, and to divert from what the SEC action actually states.
The SEC issue is only of Auctus not having registered as a securities dealer, and therefore is about Auctus transacting as an "unregistered securities dealer."
Your claim that it's Auctus having been predatory upon Xeriant is clever, but lame, misleading, and incorrect:
How convenient (and 'smart') to completely negate consideration there is another party involved, that:
"Maxim Group LLC acted as the exclusive placement agent for the offering."
Ah right, so now it will be excuse that Maxim Group LCC walked Xeriant into an Auctus predatory loan, and into both of Xeriant's Auctus Note default extensions, even where Keith Duffy, and Xeriant's Advisory Board, and Maxim Group LLC, and XTI Aircraft, and Alfred Rapetti, all were just fine with the $6.05M loan, as they all cozied right up to Auctus.
Maybe the SEC will actually start busting American stock scammers, instead of small time foreigner stock scammers with 'funny' middle east, persian, russian, or slavic names.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
