InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

15for2

06/04/23 10:05 AM

#303676 RE: MU_Redskin1 #303675

nice find, MU,
looks like the 'fix' was in all along, go figure~
Now that is out of the way, time for $DBMM 2.0 to shine!
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

janice shell

06/04/23 4:35 PM

#303765 RE: MU_Redskin1 #303675

SEC DOEnforcement CONSPIRACY & CORRUPTION was reveled by the Inspector General and third party forensic investigators! Department of Enforcement spying on or covertly obtaining Judiciary emails seems pretty corrupt to me!

There was nothing "covert" or "corrupt" about it, and the SEC did not say there was. It was, as the Statement explains, a software programming problem. The Commission also says that no Enforcement attorneys accessed the information that had accidentally become available to them.
icon url

cardmaster114

06/10/23 5:13 PM

#306157 RE: MU_Redskin1 #303675

Nice work on the information. As you said, time to move on to bigger fish.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

LOVE*PINK

06/10/23 5:26 PM

#306159 RE: MU_Redskin1 #303675

I POSTED THIS A YEAR OR SO AGO.

THAT INSIDERS ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THEIR POWERS.
THAT INSIDERS ARE WORING WITH NAKED SHORTS TO PROTECT THEM.

WHAT I POSTED A YEAR OR SO AGO - TODAY - SEC ITSELF CONFIRMED IT.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172053011

IT WAS ALL CLEAR. THE WAY THEY HANDLED THE $DBMM OIP.
I KNEW THAT FROM THE WAY THEY WERE ISSUING ORDERS and
THE WAY THESIS WERE POSTED ON $DBMM OIP ON THE SOCIAL MEDIA.
WAS AN EASY CATCH.

NOW - THE TRUTH IS OUT.

$DBMM.
icon url

johnydollar

06/10/23 5:38 PM

#306163 RE: MU_Redskin1 #303675

But but but the SEC cannot be corrupt we heard over and over.......

SMH...... what a shame this is.......

If you hire the fox to guard the chickens coop.......

Install hidden cameras......

Eventually the fox will get hungry......

And the evidence will be undeniable....
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

cardmaster114

07/04/23 10:55 AM

#310084 RE: MU_Redskin1 #303675

It is quite apparent the SEC needs to be cleaned up ASAP. Stealing information from another agency is a crime. What if that information was shared with a third party outside the agency? My guess is the action is a crime, but the information obtained about DBMM may not be damaging, possibly just general information.