InvestorsHub Logo

eb0783

06/03/23 11:05 AM

#45121 RE: jerrybrockman #45120

Lol. Yes, and all of those cows that Texas raises. Lol

Dallas-Cowboys

06/03/23 11:45 AM

#45122 RE: jerrybrockman #45120

I wasn’t trying to slam you thinking out of the box is a good thing. I’m not expert on methane or natural gas either I’m sure there is probably refining differences. I do know from my GE days that the LM2500 engine (this engine was supposed to run Delfin’s compressor station at one time not sure if still is the case) running on natural gas has a coking problem. Natural gas has more hydrocarbons than methane among other things. I believe methane has more hydrogen atoms. There must be something about this cowboys name people either want to jump my a$$ or delete me:)

Vitamin310

06/03/23 1:54 PM

#45128 RE: jerrybrockman #45120

Here’s an article estimating an approximate volume of LNG to be used for SpaceX. The approximate volume is 1000 tons of LNG per starship per launch. Later in the article is also describing how LNG can be further refined to produce methane

http://www.energy-cg.com/NorthAmericanNatGasSupplyDemandFund/NaturalGasDemand_MethaneFuelMuskStarship.html