InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

thelimeyone

05/31/23 4:41 PM

#302516 RE: CD_98 #302506

DBMM

So many good posts your putting out there CD_98.This one is no exception.
Glad your with the winning team.

tlo.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

jaiguruji7

05/31/23 7:16 PM

#302550 RE: CD_98 #302506

Hi CD_98,

Totally agree with you in the below paragraphs that you have mentioned as below:

If whoever naked shorted, margin call comes, and they have no liquid assets to cover then the broker must cover. If the broker cannot cover due to no liquid assets available, the DTCC must cover. The DTCC CNS program is where the naked short shares came from in the first place so the DTCC is responsible to cover. The DTCC has insurance for matters like this.

More than likely if monies are wired to offshore accounts like the Cayman Islands from a broker or family office those accounts will be sought to pay off margin calls even in the face of bankruptcy, OR those accounts possibly get frozen.

The DTCC does not want to pay these margins even though they can afford to.



The main things to determine are as below:

1) What are the BIG CATALYSTS that will cause these crooks to cover?

? DBMM OTCQB UPLIST will not be a big catalyst, and will only cause panic to the naked shorts and start the naked short covering if the buying volume surges after the UPLIST, as larger and institutional investors may start buying.

? An ACQUISITION/MERGER

--> Will force these naked shorts to cover, as the ticker symbol, CUSIP#, Company Address will all change for DBMM and will be the ones for the company acquiring DBMM or that DBMM is merging into.
--> Also it will cause DBMM to become a VALUE play, and will cause large buying by larger and institutional investors, depending.

? Issuing special dividends in the form of restricted shares like GTI*! may force short covering.

? Pusruing Legal Actions against the naked shorts and Alpine, a very time consuming process, with no guarantee, unless they request the DBMM Blue sheets from FINRA and can prove the illegal DBMM stock manipulation, which will force naked short covering.


2) If Alpine is expelled from FINRA, that will not make the naked shorts (Kramers) to cover, as they can now use another Broker to naked short DBMM.


3) Also as you mentioned

The DTCC does not want to pay these margins even though they can afford to.

IF THAT HAPPENS, it is not a good thing for us DBMM longs, the reason is that Kramer naked shorts will not cover as they don't have the funds, Alpine will not cover as they will eventually file bankruptcy and will not have the funds, so our only hope is for DTCC to cover and clean up the mess, and if they don't (for whatever reason) DBMM investors are screwed.

Please provide your thoughts. Thanks!!

JMHO
Bullish
Bullish