InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MD1941

05/24/23 2:16 PM

#39114 RE: jay14 #39113

What about the fake team? Why can't we meet the team?

The real truth.
Fourteen years without a real deal.
Less than $400k in total revenue. (14 years)
Ex-CEO filed Chapter 11 Bankruptcy that was converted to Chapter 7.
Didn't disclose his Z-trim problems.
Didn't disclose his $8 million judgment.
Slandered MAXD's angel investor.
Lied to other investors.
Created a disturbing website.
There's a lot more!
icon url

uber darthium

05/24/23 2:17 PM

#39115 RE: jay14 #39113

Actually, no, it hasn’t. Certainly to the degree it is about to be done and this accounting has criminal implications for Team Halpern

Real Truth is, this post I'm replying to!!!!
Forensic accounting was already done through
BK 7 11....
Next!!!!



Still waiting on the Press Release by Rurouni out of Japan.

I keep checking and have others doing so also, fluent in their Japanese native tongue

In other news I just saw on Bloomberg that Budweiser is working hard to raise their CEI. With Greg’s natural talents, he should go over there under contract, to service the needs of Budweiser and get their Index higher
icon url

J Galt

05/24/23 6:04 PM

#39128 RE: jay14 #39113

“Could it be JB is forever banned with SEC, or is it really Harvey Vechery's past finally catching up to him????” John Blaisure has never been banned by the SEC or been restricting from trading. Greg Halpern knows this. He has never been accused of anything by the SEC. Halpern knows this. If that were the case, Halpern would have plastered it all over the Hoodwinkers website instead of posting false claims and innuendo. He would be posting documents here instead of making leading comments through his personal megaphone.

The fact is that Blaisure has never been contacted by the SEC about his own behavior or actions. He has talked with them many times when he was the CEO of MAXD, but never about himself. The ridiculous statements Halpern has made about names and aliases, grand jury testimony, and SEC documents have all been run by the SEC attorney and there are no issues there. Greg knows this as well. Once again, a man living in a tiny glass house should be careful not to throw miniature stones. The SEC will most definitely be looking at Greg Halpern when the forensic work is done. There are several questions I know of that I would be asking him if I were an agent.

As to “Harvey’s past catching up to him,” once again this is a leading statement on a road to nowhere. As was the case with Blaisure, all of the false accusations about Harvey, including those on the Hoodwinkers website, are nothing more than a feeble attempt to discredit him and cause unjust harm. Harvey was like a father to Greg, loaning him millions personally along with $6m to buy out the debt and fund the operations of MAXD. It’s unethical to take that much money from a man and then claim falsehoods after the money is cut off.

The judge studied the Hoodwinkers site and was not impressed. I would think it would be a good idea to do a little more research before posting falsehoods as judgment day comes for all of us.
icon url

J Galt

05/24/23 6:07 PM

#39129 RE: jay14 #39113

As to the mansion comments from the board poster, “Mansion, another fabrication when Harvey Vechery knows the Truth....” Yes. Harvey does know the truth. Halpern was renting his first mansion from a couple while claiming to everyone who listened he owned the property. He did not. He moved when they asked him to. He then convinced Harvey Vechery to loan him the downpayment money on his next mansion and then provided him additional help by having friends in the lending business set him up with a mortgage. He then stopped making payments and they had to foreclose on him, embarrassing Harvey in the process.This action resulted in Halpern filing personal bankruptcy. This also led to Vechery paying off the house, as well as all the additional fees in the Chapter 7 case, and then evicting Halpern from the house when the real Greg Halpern was revealed. This is all public information that has been included in legal action or posted online. Nothing new here, just responding to the veiled accusations.