InvestorsHub Logo

uber darthium

05/22/23 2:09 AM

#39049 RE: jay14 #39048

Blah, blah, blah, and the court has adjudicated a judgement which restricts Greg “GH” Halpern directly or anyone acting on his behalf from communicating on any boards in any manner having to do with MAXD.

This is comical. When one’s foe is self destructing the best advice for MAXD shareholders is to sit back, grab the popcorn, and watch Greg and his “friends” dig themselves a deeper and deeper hole.

MAXD

MD1941

05/22/23 9:43 AM

#39052 RE: jay14 #39048

I want to understand the mindset of someone that supports a fourteen year failure. I don't get it! What could it be that makes someone support a toxic failure?

The bottom line is that the ex-CEO has less than $400k in total revenue.

J Galt

05/22/23 11:37 AM

#39056 RE: jay14 #39048

As I stated on another board, after a nice Sunday morning brunch with family, I came back to read the full-frontal assault from the Halpernettes. The main course consisted of the usual suspects, with a little overly emotional commentary from our board poster on the side. The main spokesman for the Asian business, Tenchi, began posting on the other site. Four separate posts with each one pushing the same theme. Each post parroting the same regime endorsed talking points. “The Japan deal was huge and was just being launched!!!!” “If HV had waited just a bit longer!!!!” Harvey Vechery “screwed the pooch!!!!” Harvey Vechery is a “bad actor” who intended to “shut down trading” with his “agenda” to intentionally “screw the shareholders.” All nonsense. All comments designed for one purpose, to prepare for the expected legal battle.

These were the side items on the Sunday menu, “the shareholders are out!!!!” and “MAXD as a company is dead!!!!” and the desert? “Now the lawsuits are going to fly, and it will be two or three years before….!!!!”

The “I’m mad and I’m not going to take it anymore” attitude exhibited on this board, as well as Tenchi’s snark on the other site, is both understandable and laughable but will not achieve the desired intent. Most shareholders have been mad for many years and aren’t going to fall for the “banana in the tailpipe…excrement” again as we’ve seen it too many times over the 14-year span of false advertising.

Here’s the point, if all the Japan business nonsense was true, why would Greg not have shown up in court to let the judge know he had the “Holy Grail” of pump and dumps under his control? Why not go to HV, hat in hand, and offer him a payback deal if he “waited a bit longer!!!!” Why did he not fight for it instead of remaining quiet? Halpern knew about the court case in January. He also knew about the court date in April. He knew it was getting serious. Why not approach HV before the last minute? Cut a deal for Rurouni to have the audio and move forward taking over the UK and Asia business. If the Asian business was so great, why was there no attempt to salvage it? My opinion, and that’s all it is, Halpern waited until the court ruled to announce the depth and scope of the deal so he would have his basis for Team Rurouni’s righteous indignation. Not to mention the “let’s get Harvey’s money” lawsuit.