Replies to post #39038 on Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

The poster stated, “another case, more lawyer's, who will be the real winner's.... “ and then followed up with, “If this gets Infront of the Judge it could be another two to three years, IF....” Thanks to Greg Halpern, Harvey Vechery’s lawyers have already been winners. Huge winners. How about Halpern’s? I was told he hadn’t been paid, which hardly classifies him as a “winner.”

The poster also stated, “more lawsuits coming!!!!” And then this, “ More courtroom drama coming.... MAXD shareholders, more time waiting....” Greg Halpern has been penalizing shareholder for 14 years and now he wants to continue that treatment for his own personal gain. By the way, how does this poster know there are “more suits coming?” Another email exchange?

This is nothing more than being prodded to prep for a legal case on a road to nowhere. Halpern had no money to file the reports with the SEC and I heard the accountant wasn’t paid either, which is probably why there are no filings. No attorney will take the case without being paid. Especially with Halpern’s track record on the legal front. I’m sure they would want funding in advance to take on the big legal team. As to an attorney taking on a class action suit on behalf of the shareholders, I would assume any barrister worth his salt would check the facts and decline the case. Any shareholder signing on to a suit such as this one would need to do his due diligence before joining the team.

“now it seems MAXD shareholders are OUT!!!!” how does the board poster know they are out? Is the poster talking to all of them? That's certainly not what I am hearing. How can they get out now if they can’t sell or buy shares on the open market? Why would they do that when they haven’t even heard from the “new team?”

All this is just bluster. Once again, this was pointed out over a year ago on these same boards. Can’t do business? Let’s claim Harvey Vechery caused the downfall of MAXD and make him pay financially for Halpern’s own failures. This approach is both transparent and unethical.