InvestorsHub Logo

J Galt

05/21/23 6:09 PM

#39041 RE: jay14 #39037

That’s right! I almost forgot. Let’s bring the two Mexican mines into the legal picture here on the boards. A Softball designed to allow Halpern to respond and expound on how the mining deals were shut down due to Harvey’s evil legal team, who were only pressing his rights and collecting on debts. How dare he!

Both mines were just about to explode with quadrillions of dollars for each individual shareholder. Or was it bazillions? I can’t remember the monetary term Halpern used to promote the mining deal in his Vimeo production. No matter. Better add this to the class action lawsuit. Rile up the shareholders to believe they were about to finally leave the proletariat and buy that island off the coast of Belize.

The problem is none of this will work with the judge as there is no real evidence Halpern had any deals anywhere and 14 years of evidence to the contrary. In addition, Halpern could have pressed his “rights” with the court and chose not to show up. He could have explained to the judge how he was on the verge of success and could he hold off on his ruling. But he did not show. He could have gone to Vechery and begged for forgiveness for a thousand transgressions and asked for more time, but he did not.

As I’ve stated before, Harvey Vechery contacted the transfer agent and locked down the shares on the mining deal, which was the prudent thing to do. Halpern attempted to raise money from the shareholders for the mining operation but was unable to complete the deal. Halpern can attempt to blame Vechery and include it in the suit but that won’t fly. The deal could not be completed without both money and stock. Vechery only locked down the stock, which he was entitled to, and had nothing to do with raising money. This legal approach won’t work.