Replies to post #39029 on Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

It was stated, “The Plush Bunny Operation, Gay Rabbit aka RED is a viable product already in existence that opens door to variety of marketing revenue streams for all companies involved.” The point is that it doesn’t matter whether the “operation” is real, and the “product” is viable. It is not a MAXD operation, nor is the product owned by MAXD. They both belong to, and are controlled by, someone else. Not Greg Halpern. MAXD could obtain a licensing agreement for the audio part of the equation, but we have not seen a letter of intent, no contract, and no official announcement of any arrangements by MAXD on a known and respected financial site. Only more words online from the Halpernettes. Based on so many past “deals” promoted and glorified by Halpern, which turned out to be “Beluga” sized fabrications, why would Vechery, or any other shareholder, believe anything Greg “cry wolf” Halpern said?

[b“Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound.” This statement by the judge, who carefully reviewed all the information provided to the court by the legal team, including Z-Trim and the Hoodwinkers website, clearly stated that the “misrepresentations regarding the business of Max Sound” was one reason for his removal by the court.

Once again, why would any thinking person believe anything Halpern said about Japan? Plush bunnies aside, Vechery and the shareholders rejected Greg Halpern. They did not reject MAFIP or Japan as they were not directly involved with them. It was always “Halpern is waiting” on “Team Rurouni” and we were supposed to believe his words on a chat board. There is no faith across the board in Halpern. Why should anyone have faith in a man who doesn’t tell the truth? Why would anyone follow this type of leadership for two city blocks in Nashville, much less all the way to Japan.

[J Galt]

“Defendant Halpern has engaged in conduct in his capacity as a director of defendant Max Sound constituting fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation.” These legal words have meaning. I’ve stated in the past many times, “conduct unbecoming for a CEO of a publicly traded company.” What does that mean? The leader of a public company needs to act the part. Not only in the boardroom, but also in the domain known as “social media.” He can’t be posting videos and disclosing inside information to aliases on a chat board. He can’t be slandering and libeling former partners, shareholders, and his angel investor without consequences. He can’t be manipulating the stock through fabricated deals. That’s the background for the removal process.

[J Galt]

“Future legal purposes” is a phrase from this post we should all focus on because it lays out the Greg Halpern counterattack strategy. The same strategy I’ve been talking about for over a year now. “Can’t make it as a businessman? Ok, then I’m going to be a litigator!” That’s why Halpern kept “secret files” on his partners and associates. For “future legal purposes.” "Can’t work with them? Then slander them!"

He used Connie Nash’s technology to sue Google. He didn’t invent it, develop it, or market it. He used it for litigation purposes. He used Eli Attia’s EA technology to sue Google. He didn’t invent it, develop it, or market it. He used it for litigation purposes. RED and the plush bunny chronicles? He didn’t write it, animate it, edit it, develop it, or market it. But now he is planning on using it for litigation purposes.

Harvey Vechery had him removed before he could complete the Japan deal so he must be sued! Does anyone else see a pattern? Now connect the dots. What does Harvey Vechery have that makes him a worthy target of Halpern’s litigation strategy? Money. He has money. So why not develop a strategy to steal his money. Oh wait. Hasn’t he already done that? I digress. That’s the Halpern MO. And Team Rurouni wonders why Harvey Vechery no longer wants to be associated with him.

How about this comment: “There were two deals going on, now one of it is lost due to the injunction.” And then there’s this one: “Japan and any other companies will not touch MAX-D HD AUDIO now with this injunction and I believe Maxd CEO pending class action is ready! The injunction is the needle to move with the class action.” Why is Halpern talking with Team Rurouni about his legal strategy? “this legal injunction it just threw all the two years planned out the window!” Once again, let's build a case!

This statement from the judge should be kept in mind, “anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities….” I think Team Rurouni understands this edict and that’s the reason for this long digital “you’re going to miss plush bunny when he’s gone” speech, and warning of “future legal purposes” from the Samurai litigator. As stated, “The Plush Bunny Operation will continue on without MAX-D HD AUDIO platform.” In other words, the bunny marches on alone while Greg Halpern files suit against Vechery for marching forward without Greg Halpern.

[Coo breeze]

Jay, can you find out anything about the two Mexican mines?

[J Galt]

“Rurouni had a great plan to get HD AUDIO platform in the door and the stock to run up to new heights.” That’s Halpern. Always a great plan to run the stock to new heights. Never a good business plan to market the product. A good plan to market the product is one thing, getting the product successfully to market and earning revenue is another. MAXD and Greg Halpern haven’t achieved either. Running the stock to new heights is temporary if there is no solid business plan to back it up. What Halpern is saying is, if only given the chance, he could have run up the stock so everyone who wanted to sell could do so and make money. Running up the stock might be good for those looking for a quick buck, but it is not a good business plan.

[J Galt]

“Unlike Tip Solution (that was planned from Vechery).” Harvey’s plan or not, the engineering was never finished by MAXD for Tip Solutions so the launch couldn’t be completed, and the quarterly payments, by contract, did not have to be made. This was because Halpern didn’t pay the engineers with the money Harvey gave to him for that purpose. A legitimate CEO would have focused on the quarterly payments in his back yard instead of chasing false gold in Mexico and plush bunnies in Japan. Where were those quarterly payments from Formula 4 by the way? Or didn’t they have to be paid because of the obvious familial nepotism?

“Follow the D Filings from Vechery to see what he was doing to with the stock manipulation.” Harvey Vechery could have converted his shares at particular points in time, but it would have had a negative impact on MAXD, so he did not. He could have sold shares in the past, but he did not. He has sold a grand total of approximately $236 dollars’ worth of shares in his entire time with MAXD. That’s all. He loaned money to Halpern virtually every time he asked. Millions of dollars. Now he is painted as the bad guy because Halpern thinks its germane to his future legal case.

Halpern really shouldn’t be throwing stones at glass houses considering his own Machiavellian maneuvers during his bankruptcy. Formula 4? Mexican Land Deal valuation? Value of preferred shares? As to the “D Filings,” that has all been taken care of, is current, and has been cleared by the SEC attorney. I’ve been told HV is not worried about it so “file away!” Starting a legal battle with a man with money, backed up by facts, is never a good idea. One has proof. The other has innuendo.

[J Galt]

Of course, the board poster is upset. The horse he bet on has gone lame and been pulled from the race by the official body governing for the competition.

Every MAXD shareholder is not upset Halpern is gone. The major shareholders are apparently happy he is gone because they are tired of being sold a bill of goods. The angel investor is tired of being insulted and many other investors believe Harvey Vechery was treated unbelievably rudely on the boards by Halpern. Not to mention the Halpernettes. There is no proof any of the deals mentioned in either post. There is no LOI, no contract, no official PR on real websites. You can scream all you want about how we were all on the verge of huge profits if it weren’t for Vechery but the proof is in the pudding and Halpern is no chef.

The poster can continue to use the semi-vulgar canned phrase all he wants but many of us feel the company is better off being run by someone appointed by a businessman instead of a serial manipulator and professional fabricator with a 14-year track record of failure.

The poster stated, “HV should of waited a little bit longer!!!!” If that’s the case, maybe Halpern should have approached him and explained why he should “wait a bit longer.” He did not. Halpern should have brought details about the deals and begged him to be patient. He did not. He should have approached the judge and laid out his case. He did not. Whatever the reason, the plush bunny show is over for now.

[J Galt]

“another case, more lawyer's, who will be the real winner's....” I doubt Harvey Vechery would say he “won” and should be classified as a “winner,” especially with all the millions he invested in MAXD and Greg Halpern. He was awarded the company in a legal court case in exchange for his millions he lost to Halpern. What did he get in return? Who knows as of now. I’m sure they will assess the value of any assets and go from there. The point is that no one has been a winner in this passion play. Shareholders, partners, many investors and especially Harvey Vechery.

The poster also stated for the second time, “MAXD shareholders are OUT!!!!” Once again, how does the board poster know this? Shareholders can’t sell right now unless they have a licensed trader on the level 3 market.

Harvey’s so-called “agenda,” that the poster keeps referring to, was to help revitalize the business so he, and every other shareholder, could get a return on investment. No matter how loudly one barks about the injustice of losing out on the Asian market, the long-term plan would never work with Halpern at the helm. See the “looting” comment from the judge in the case:

“Greg Halpern Does Not Adhere to Corporate Formalities and Operates Max Sound in Order to Loot Max Sound and its Shareholders.” That statement was made by the honorable Judge Timothy B. Taylor Superior Court of California San Diego County in the April 28th hearing.

“Bad actor?” This statement is very interesting considering he’s been such a nice guy to Halpern for all these years. Not only with loaning him millions of dollars personally, but then having his friends arrange the house loan for him and even loaning him the deposit money. He then bailed him out in the bankruptcy and paid all the bills, including the house loan, to allow Halpern to walk away. It was only when Vechery discovered all the deceptions, fabrications, and fake deals that he was forced to take a stand. Bad actor indeed. Who’s the real bad actor? All Halpern had to do was approach Vechery with respect and I’m assuming Harvey would have at least checked into the viability of the plush bunny chronicles. Would that have made him a good actor?