InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

crescentmotor

05/18/23 9:58 AM

#415911 RE: Doc328 #415909

The 2% is my estimate for chance of approval under AA with the assumption that an additional trial is underway.



The lines are drawn. Either you or Dr. Missling (who is advertising an AA approach) will wind up looking like an idiot.
icon url

WolfofMia

05/18/23 3:52 PM

#415983 RE: Doc328 #415909

laughable, what are Dr.M options strike price again?
icon url

LakeshoreLeo1953

05/18/23 4:26 PM

#415988 RE: Doc328 #415909

There in lies the TRADE not the NOPE
icon url

Joseph_K

05/18/23 6:47 PM

#416007 RE: Doc328 #415909

I appreciate the reply, Doc. (There are less skeptical Anavex fans here who might not, but I do. It's a tough board to post on so critically when those posts gets such sparse – or harsh – welcome.)

I understand almost all your reply. If you don't mind, can you explain this phrase: "Imputation measures were not addressed."

I wrote a long message and decided not to post it: We've all re-re-re-rehashed much of it already.

But I'll ask this: Considering the primary message-board-member response to your points is Missling said the endpoints were met (which clearly carries zero weight with you), do you think he's a charlatan, or the Elizabeth Holmes of Alzheimer's drug development, or that he's stuck his neck in a liability noose?