Replies to post #64308 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Hi_Lo]

Plus the court did seem to give weight to the arguments that the case is is similar to a will, where heirs aren't individually named but have standing to appeal, so the optimism about dismissal is misplaced. They'll have to fight it to the end and possibly go back to district court for more.

Let's see what the court document ACTUALLY says:



The court is not "giving weight" to that argument. It is specifically saying that the "appellant contends" - not that it is putting weight on it.

If anything one of the judges has already emphasized that Calasse is not a party to the case. It puts the burden on Calasse to prove that he is.

Plus, the court says that the "merit of the appeal" can also be in addressed in the brief which I'm sure Sharp's lawyers will take full advantage of.



Stop trying to skew the information that is actually there.

Also what was definitevely stated by the court was that it doesn't believe that Calasse needed to be served as was so often stated. That is a point that Calasse can no longer use, which is a negative for Calasse.

And using another poker analogy that was referenced before, a "tell" was given by the argument of "Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginburg" that was brought up and emphasized so often here and that being the exact case referenced in this new court document.

There seems to be a connection with what was repeatedly referenced here and what was brought up by your buddy Calasse's lawyer in the new court document.

Statistically it could be a coincidence but I would bet it isn't.

And another statistical anomolly is that ONLY Sharp ticker board are being used to further these skewed arguments.

Nothing has changed in the case other than it will probably be more drawn out more than expected.

[Spites]

Im not actually too concerned about the case getting dismissed. If it does it does, if not, ok, Calasse gets another day in court. Who am I to say he doesn’t deserve one. I did find the court papers really interesting. I’m actually looking forward to how it folds out, simply as a curiosity.
The questions about being a party without being served, whether that’s actually necessary, the idea that a custodianship can be granted without service, it’s all very interesting.

[1kgwxman]

Nobody believes the court " gave weight" to Calasse.
This campaign to support Caloser continues to lose ground to the facts.
I'm just going to hold all my shares until this issue is resolved.
Not selling a single share.