Since nothing has been offered as conclusive evidence that its not the CEO of PCT
Guilty until proven innocent I guess?
And as I have stated many times... I am no fan of Gary... not going to defend Gary. But I find these loose standards of making definitive accusations without facts to be troubling.
I recognize that it's very possible that PCT's Gary is the same Gary mentioned in the 1979 case. But to say that it definitely is, without any corroborative proof is irresponsible IMO.