I'll need to explain again so theres no further misunderstanding going on which could mislead investors
The other post stated any posts claiming the 1979 GG is the same as PCTs is misrepresentations, omissions etc etc
Not the case. The 1979 GG may indeed be the CEO of PCT. However, on what basis can anyone claim its a misrepresentations when it hasnt been proven one way or the other?
Best to say theres no conclusive proof yet, either way, just strong, reasonable suspicion