InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HokieHead

05/04/23 7:48 AM

#129712 RE: Hi_Lo #129709

Unfortunately more fallacies put to bed, and why the heck is Sharp having motions granted and court dockets updated as late as yesterday on a ticker about to be “revoked”? That’s hilarious.

Why does GVSI have a SEC CIK number if it’s not registered?



Why does FINRA keep extending, not “revoking” lmfao.



I’ll stick with facts, not fairytales.
icon url

wakeupdummy

05/04/23 8:51 AM

#129716 RE: Hi_Lo #129709

the whole controversy surrounding a RM
may be a moot point.
i don't believe G ever used the term "reverse merger". he simply said merger and in what seemed a very general term.
people just glom onto the reverse merger label because it has become a favorite OTC catch phrase used in an attempt to sound knowledgeable.
a legit RM of any value is unlikely,some kind of partial acquisition would serve just as well as it would be perceived as the former and have the same affect on the pps.
potato/potata ;-)