Replies to post #117188 on HUMBL Inc (HMBL)

[NoMoDo]

Who said anything about shorting HMBL? Certainly not me. In fact, when the responder suggested something about shorting HMBL, I stated clearly that 3mil was a non-issue and I could care less about HMBL reported shorting atm.

I was looking at the daily average trading of HMBL. Someone should have noticed that these numbers ON THE SHORT REPORT are different from the daily average trading that is reported through time and sales. Why? One person guessed that it was a different frequency. NOPE. Daily average over the same period is daily average - (mean average - not median, not mode).

The "average" of 60mil average and 50mil average for reported in 2 consecutive 15 day spans should always equal the average for 30 days. Frequency... (add emoji of yellow character slapping his forehead)

I specifically posted the daily average from the link you copied for a reason. Seems nobody knows why. Odd.

[inventor1]

There is a brokerage and Utah doing it, so don’t kid yourself!
And I will not disclose it, so don’t ask !
Your information may be factual, but it’s very misleading
The shorts are playing the game !!



My HMBL opinion

[inventor1]

If a sale is being initiated by the holder of restricted 144 stock, even though the owner of those shares is technically a long, the sale is listed as a short sale because the actual certificates are not yet "clean" via the transfer agent.

This is factually not true the 144 restriction is indeed, lifted after they are transferred.
Therefore, it is impossible for shares to be counted as shorted shares !
Only after the shares have been transferred to the designated broker, or perhaps lent to a broker ! And said broker has the ability to short the shares, and now counted as shorted !