I'm no lawyer, but I think you'd have to prove something along the line of malicious intent. I mean, not to excuse Kay, who's a rat of the first order, but he could possibly claim that even though they had filed for a reverse split, that he was hoping, and had reason to believe, it might be avoided.
You buy fire insurance and don't get a refund if you don't have a fire, right?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
