Replies to post #3731 on TAAT Global Alternatives Inc. (TOBAF)

[Scumbag Fraudsters]

The chart indicates low revenue due to lack of sales.

Do you think consumers care whether something is patented? A patent's great for entrepreneurs on Shark Tank, but do you think their customers care?

I don't know if my cereal, peanut butter, antacid or mouthwash are patented, why would I care about something I smoke?

Thousands of people buy knockoff goods every day in America. You ever browsed aliexpress.com?

Patent or not, there's no nicotine. So as Mick would say - you can't get no satisfaction.


This is the first time I've read any part of the patent process and I must say - it seems shoddy.

They failed to explain several critical terms (sensory perception, taste and order).

On pages 3-4 it says:

9. maintaining a first non-tobacco and non-nicotine plant-based material within a liquid medium (the plant fiber are contacted with a solvent in order to remove the water soluble components. In one embodiment, the solvent comprises only water [0070]) in a to reduce natural terpenes in the first non-tobacco and non-nicotine plant-based material to limit a sensory perception of the plant-based material to a first predetermined level;

in a to reduce? That's an incomplete sentence. In an effort to reduce natural terpenes?


Do you think anyone would knowingly smoke coconut fibers?

12. adding at least a second reconstituted non-tobacco and non-nicotine plant-based
material as a filler (extracted cocoa husk fibers [0082])

The reply which you think is a "good counter" failed to define the critical terms that are crucial to the patent. They can't say the process will "limit a sensory perception of the plant-based material" without defining which senses will be affected and how that will occur.

Will my hearing perception be limited? How about my sight? That would not be good.

That omission alone makes the reply DOA imo. It also makes DeFrank seem DeIncompetent.


The company should be required to disclose all ingredients on the packaging.

I don't understand why smoking products get a pass when it comes to disclosure while other products taken internally don't. All-natural supplements and organic foods must disclose their ingredients, why not smoking materials?

Consumers have a right to know what they're putting into their bodies. This one contains various plant-based materials and taste ingredients.

Even Prevegen's packaging says HEY DUMBASS, YOU'RE EATING JELLYFISH! (not in so may words).