Replies to post #38816 on Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

The point is how they came about this potential “truth.” How did Tenchi see the documents? How could it be “independent of GH?” He is the last man standing at MAXD. You can't just invent the truth. It has to come from someone.

What Tenchi posted is not yet public information. To top it off he posted it on a financial chat board. Publicizing non-public information is not allowed. It’s been going on for years and has mainly been used to promote the stock. Many people are tired of this lack of ethics.

As to MAFIP, I have been on the site in the past. Right up until they required information to even log on. Why would I ever want to give personal information to an overseas company connected to Greg Halpern? Why would I potentially corrupt my hard drive, as so often happens with these sites? They don’t follow the same rules and laws Yahoo and IHUB are required to adhere to in relation to the control of personal information. Not interested.

[J Galt]

I guess we will find out today if "what tenchi, rurouni, utise, jay and others have said is true."

It's now April 28th. To recap the public record: the court entered a default judgment in favor of Harvey Vechery and against Greg Halpern/Max Sound on January 11, 2023. The Vechery Family Trust then petitioned the court to render judgment in favor of the defendant, for relief demanded in the complaint, permanent injunction, and removal of Halpern from the company.

The case is scheduled at 11AM Pacific time today in the Superior Court of California County of San Diego and has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor. This is the only date that counts right now. Not the May 19th date Halpern has been claiming to bring the SEC filings up to date. This is all part of the public record.

As to what comes next, let’s just wait and see what the court says today. As we all know, the results in our judicial system are not always predictable so we must all wait to hear the verdict. No matter what the court rules on the relief issue, the judgment is in place and must be satisfied.