Replies to post #586607 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[Troymister]

A not-so-splendid example of Linda's poor communications showing at the annual meeting. This quote is as if one of her colleagues slipped her a piece of paper that read, "Maybe you should tell 'em we think our drug works on cancers, other than brain cancer?"

[HappyLibrarian]

I actually agree with Ms. Powers on that - a fake partnership where NWBO does almost all the heavy lifting but gets no revenue is not going to be taken by markets as a sign of VP confidence and so we would get all the negatives of running a costly trial on our own and then have to share any benefit. Saying no to partnerships that do not have a fairer distribution of costs etc. makes good sense.

[Horseb4CarT]

It’s just that LP is discerning and not cow towing (sp?) to BP.

Whether this approach yields more or less remains to be seen.

[norisknorewards]

You've got to be shorting me!

Wow!

[Doc logic]

Poor Man -,

NWBO was in no position to sponsor that trial with BMY. Why didn’t BMY just partner with UCLA like Merck did?; ). Maybe big money BMY wasn’t very serious and wanted to tease a cash strapped company with false hope offered to unsuspecting investors to try and create some backlash?; ).
Merck was obviously hoping for more leverage too but alas, to no avail at least with the Jeffries analyst and investors disappointed with combo results from the trial with Moderna.
The word on the street years ago was that NWBO was taking a big gamble but that if they could survive the impact would be felt in a big way. That time is upon us and the average investor does not see it yet. What they see is the impact of manipulation and pit bull longs holding on to their shares through “the process”. Did we have an up day today again?; ). Best wishes.