Replies to post #63576 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Yolo]

We know on 2 shells Sharp didn't provide proper notification and he was denied Custodianship - something similar to a Amicus Brief should be sent to the NVSC to make them aware of how Sharp cuts corners to hijack shells.

The strongest indicator that he will ultimately lose with WNFT is how drastically different he has handled everything for the share cancellations with SRNW and GVSI.

Those cases were filed in December and January, listed all shareholders as defendants, and have been slowed due to the requirement of serving the defendants. Later this week both companies have hearings to request service by publication, which was also never done for WNFT.

It seems clear to me that they're following the proper procedures to guarantee that there is no issue like with WNFT, but that also indicates that they expect the NVSC to rule against them. If they thought they followed all proper procedure with WNFT and would win, they wouldn't have bothered changing the procedure for SRNW/GVSI.

[FEARANDGREED]

All I care about is this case. The Nevada supreme court wants to know "why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction". As far as "legal errors" are concerned, Calasse tried twice in the lower court and failed.

I remember the the judge in the lower court actually chuckled at the Calasse legal team's stance during the last reconsideration go around (I watched live via the "BlueJeans" video conferencing app). He told Calasse's attorneys that if he was to reverse his decision based in their arguments for reconsideration, that anyone would be able to waltz in to court and say "Hey... No way man... that's not fair - we meant to do it this way"" and get their decision reversed.
..Its been awhile so Im not quoting the Judge exactly word for word, but that was the spirit of his attitude and language beyond a doubt.

Again, all the court wants to know at the moment is "why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction". ...They would not have filed an order to show cause if it was meritless. And once again, I have derived my opinions based on the legal professionals that I am very closely acquainted (Im married to one of them).