InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 7661
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2010

Re: I-Glow post# 63576

Tuesday, 04/18/2023 6:46:19 PM

Tuesday, April 18, 2023 6:46:19 PM

Post# of 69161
All I care about is this case. The Nevada supreme court wants to know "why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction". As far as "legal errors" are concerned, Calasse tried twice in the lower court and failed.

I remember the the judge in the lower court actually chuckled at the Calasse legal team's stance during the last reconsideration go around (I watched live via the "BlueJeans" video conferencing app). He told Calasse's attorneys that if he was to reverse his decision based in their arguments for reconsideration, that anyone would be able to waltz in to court and say "Hey... No way man... that's not fair - we meant to do it this way"" and get their decision reversed.
..Its been awhile so Im not quoting the Judge exactly word for word, but that was the spirit of his attitude and language beyond a doubt.

Again, all the court wants to know at the moment is "why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction". ...They would not have filed an order to show cause if it was meritless. And once again, I have derived my opinions based on the legal professionals that I am very closely acquainted (Im married to one of them).



This guy walks up to me at the horse track... As I placed my bet he scoffed at my pick. ....Then offered to by my ticket for half price..