InvestorsHub Logo

squingeqbob

04/13/23 4:22 PM

#138207 RE: tedpeele #138186

Where to even start?

First, I'd tell them about the bonuses first so I wasn't wasting any more breath than I do with my posts.

Second - Man I wish I knew what "average reasonable people" were thinking. I bet even Karnac couldn't reliably pull that off.

Third - Why is it that average reasonable people think "This sounds GREAT so far but I'M skeptical. I bet the next thing out of his mouth is gonna be something about massive bonuses that's gonna turn me completely off"?

Fourth - That thing that smells bad isn't LWLG.

Fifth - So greedy people should be thought of as insincere. Well, that certainly hits close to the homes of "some".

And finally -The reason the biggest cons are ignored should be pretty obvious.

The point is that I gave them the most important highlights - the market opportunity, the claimed technical superiority with some impressive results, the credentials, the developmental stage, the mystery of the Holy Grail claims...but the moment I mention the bonuses they lost interest. The average reasonable person simply is thinking 'this sounds great so far' but a bit skeptical of course too, but when they hear of the bonuses they lose interest because it smells bad to them. They would much rather see a company that doesn't seem greedy as evidence of their sincerity.

Re balance - I don't recall you responding to my post about your pros and cons. I felt you dramatically underplayed the cons side by minimizing or ignoring all together the biggest ones.