InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Whalatane

03/24/23 2:28 PM

#406234 RE: marjac #406232

Thx for the detail
Kiwi
icon url

oneragman

03/24/23 2:42 PM

#406235 RE: marjac #406232

marjac, do you really think there will be a hearing or could they rule on the briefs? Thanks for all you do!
icon url

CaptBeer

03/24/23 2:46 PM

#406236 RE: marjac #406232

If Dyk & Reyna show up again, then some actionable pushback needs to take place. I don't know what recourse an appellant would have, but it would be obvious that a coincidence of that magnitude is next to impossible.
icon url

Examiner77

03/24/23 2:58 PM

#406237 RE: marjac #406232

Marjac when do you expect we might hear from the court of appeal ?

Many thanks as always
icon url

Number sleven

03/24/23 3:06 PM

#406238 RE: marjac #406232

Marjac, At the end of this, if Hikma is found to be inducing infringement, how does Amarin benefit? I have no doubt that there is a larger strategy here. I'm not quite sure what it is.
Thanks,
Sleven,
icon url

FlyFishingStocks

03/24/23 3:38 PM

#406239 RE: marjac #406232

It is not a heavy bar for Amarin to meet in order for the CAFC to reverse and remand at this stage of the proceeding.



Except for the fact Amarin took it upon itself to change long standing FDA regulation by suing them... and won. This grudge will never go away as long as Amarin continues to do business in the U.S.A.. There's a cabal trying to prove that but no one believes it except the bears.