If we read the Message Board, we see the anti Anavex camp is much surer of their viewpoints than the Pro Anavex.
All their assertions are backed with what seems like thousands of years of authentication. They seem extremely strong and positive about all their assertions. They don't make guesses, they issue proclamations.
Then the wobbly kneed Pro Anavex Camp speculates on the possibilities that could be occurring with the developments taking place. All they have is the story Anavex tells us, trying to piece together the jigsaw puzzle, connecting dots.
Both these camps are working with the same information. How can they be so different in potential outcomes and certainty?
I would speculate that one camp isn't constrained by anything other than their desire for their outcome to be correct while the other is trying to make the most that can be made with the pieces of the puzzle that are dealt.
One is total fantasy, the other is the complexity that life always presents, requiring more than pure ego to exist.
Can anyone be 100% certain of which one is correct at this point?
My guess is no but someone could be pretty sure which one isn't.