Replies to post #15316 on Access Power & Co Inc (ACCR)

[mick]

thank you fer updating $ACCR ---
re;
I got me a PATENT PROSECUTION ATTORNEY...lol.

So is my USPTO first office action...as I received this update on my Clones by Drones patent application...here is another letter received TODAY from my PATENT ATTORNEY.

"... Please note that this is an estimate, and the response can arrive sooner or later than
the time provided.

Once we have received and reviewed it, we will reach out to let you know how to proceed...

Please see the attached First Office Action Prediction from the USPTO for your records.

The attorney assigned to your application is patent prosecution manager XXXX XXXX
who has plenty of experience in the patent field.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Have a great rest of your day!"

I know the USPTO will approve my patent application!!!

This is all coming soon to fruition.

Patrick
Bullish
BULLISH

[Zorax]

Hate to break the bad news... again. But he's not your attorney.
It's standard procedure with patents and how they process them. Your patent is passed at the same time with many many others on to the person or people who review them. They do it in bulk and send you an acknowledgment because they are professional. It's a professional courtesy.
They don't know the ex-principal of a-c-c-r from Thomas Edison. They do not assign personal attorneys no matter what the thought is.

Just didn't want a ex-owner of a-c-c-r to go off on innocent people just doing their job should they find the patent too close to others, dangerous or just plain nut job and deny it. One can keep trying in a few months I believe.

[shajandr]

All (each and every single one) of your claims will be rejected in the Office Action (OA). This is guaranteed. No claims will be allowed. Nott even one.

Claims will be rejected under 103 as obvious, under 102(a) for lacking novelty and anticipated by prior art,f or being vague and indefinite, for lacking enablement, and under 101 in view of Alice, All of the claims will be rejected, butt nott all necessarily under the same sections of 35 USC. Altho they might all be.

AND (first bone-us!)

since you have disclosed the alleged invention more than one year ago in your posts on this board, the claims should also be rejected under 102(b). Butt I will bet that you never told the patent agent or attorney about those posts. Butt I know of them and will bring it to the attention of the examiner after you get the first OA.

Other than those guaranteed OA bases of rejection, the real beauty is that this is a business method patent application, and for at least the past 10 years (more really) business method patents are essentially unenforceable in the US Federal courts and CAFC. So even if you manage to ever get one super-narrow claim allowed and pay the issue fee, you will have nothing other than expensive bond paper with a nifty ribbon for all the munny you will have spent. And I find that utterly hilarious.

AND then there are maintenance fees - look them up - every few years you will have to cough up those maintenance fees.

Just as a cherry on top, the failure to disclose your iHub posts to the PTO examiner is a no-no and could be used to invalidate any claims you could CONceivably gett allowed in court under the inequitable conduct and duty to disclose/candor with the tribunal provisions.

Butthay - pay the patent attorney - altho I bett you only have a patent agent doing the work - because patent attornies deserve your munny. Just for being who we are. Butt munny is nott he only remuneration of the biz - we gett lots of chuckles at the wacky nonsense our clients want to pay up the wazoo to file and prosecute a patent application.

At least the money will go to someone who will treat it more carefully.

[mick]

interesting CC / ACCR 0.0050 +0.0032 +177.78% USD 10:50AM EDT 18,600

someone likes $ACCR

[mick]

CC good after noon ACCR 0.0050 +0.0032 +177.78% USD 10:50AM EDT 18,600

[mick]

CyberCall™ nothing but b.s. now almost bankrupt/ soon no bid, CyberCall™

I received this update on my Clones by Drones patent application...here is another letter received TODAY from my PATENT ATTORNEY.

"... Please note that this is an estimate, and the response can arrive sooner or later than the time provided. Once we have received and reviewed it, we will reach out to let you know how to proceed...

Please see the attached First Office Action Prediction from the USPTO for your records. The attorney assigned to your application is patent prosecution manager XXXX XXXX who has plenty of experience in the patent field.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Have a great rest of your day!"

[mick]

laughing @ shareholders cyber man / attorney failed

[mick]

$ACCR ????? bid 0.0009 - ask 0.005's , i don't thinkzzz will see $0.005's again cyber man

sing sing

[shajandr]

PATRICK JENSEN should post the Office Action that rejected each and all of the claims in his patent application, each rejected on multiple bases of unpatentabiliity.

That was some more wasted munny.