Access Power & Co Inc (ACCR)

[shajandr]

All (each and every single one) of your claims will be rejected in the Office Action (OA). This is guaranteed. No claims will be allowed. Nott even one.

Claims will be rejected under 103 as obvious, under 102(a) for lacking novelty and anticipated by prior art,f or being vague and indefinite, for lacking enablement, and under 101 in view of Alice, All of the claims will be rejected, butt nott all necessarily under the same sections of 35 USC. Altho they might all be.

AND (first bone-us!)

since you have disclosed the alleged invention more than one year ago in your posts on this board, the claims should also be rejected under 102(b). Butt I will bet that you never told the patent agent or attorney about those posts. Butt I know of them and will bring it to the attention of the examiner after you get the first OA.

Other than those guaranteed OA bases of rejection, the real beauty is that this is a business method patent application, and for at least the past 10 years (more really) business method patents are essentially unenforceable in the US Federal courts and CAFC. So even if you manage to ever get one super-narrow claim allowed and pay the issue fee, you will have nothing other than expensive bond paper with a nifty ribbon for all the munny you will have spent. And I find that utterly hilarious.

AND then there are maintenance fees - look them up - every few years you will have to cough up those maintenance fees.

Just as a cherry on top, the failure to disclose your iHub posts to the PTO examiner is a no-no and could be used to invalidate any claims you could CONceivably gett allowed in court under the inequitable conduct and duty to disclose/candor with the tribunal provisions.

Butthay - pay the patent attorney - altho I bett you only have a patent agent doing the work - because patent attornies deserve your munny. Just for being who we are. Butt munny is nott he only remuneration of the biz - we gett lots of chuckles at the wacky nonsense our clients want to pay up the wazoo to file and prosecute a patent application.

At least the money will go to someone who will treat it more carefully.