“Note that Paulson does NOT require any 'proof' that you're accredited (smile imoji)”
These are OLD POSTS from a few years ago where Paulson did not ask for PROOF of being an accredited investor.
It is DIFFERENT - as of at least a year ago - where proof IS REQUIRED.
Good one digging this up from a few years ago - but it’s not the case anymore. And besides this original text came from me without any proof that Paulson operated that way in the past. So it seems like you’re using my words as ‘proof’. That doesn’t make it a ‘FACT’ — does it? ??