Replies to post #405971 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Whalatane]

Yes but maybe in this instance he should .
I agree with your previous post ...very very very low chance of success .
So dont spend $ on getting a legal team up to speed .
Marjac knows this case backwards .
Some here would like to give him a second chance ...case would now have " standing " wouldn't it if he was representing AMRN ...correct if necessary .
Full disclosure ..I was skeptical of Marjac to begin with , but was impressed with his presentation to the court .
One goal in my remaining life ...never to spend $ on legal fees or appear in court ever again :--)
Always enjoy reading your posts
Kiwi

[DAR53]

Bouf, marjac led the suit for the disinfranchised shareholders that were not represented by Amarin when they should have taken up the case. Marjac and north4000 put together great cases of law against the Judge Du decision that was made due to cropped tables. The EPADI case was denied for lack of standing and then the same Judges Dyk and Reyna were two of three judges on the appeal and again it was denied. Liberal bias all the way as 'to hell with what is right, let's protect a liberal judges opinion that was made with fraudulous presentation.
Marjac should be representing Amarin as he seems to have a much better legal knowledge than Kennedy and Singer, etc.
I would definately put my money up again for marjac to enter the court in a fair and unbiased case. He needs to have the opportunity to meet with Denner's legal team and determine what if any path for V might be going forward. It might be a slim chance as some state but it is better than nothing that Amarin has given the shareholders.

[marjac]

That is 100% accurate. I cannot and will not represent Amarin as that would be a conflict. They would never want me to represent them anyway, as they use lawyers from larger establishment law firms, and I have no such delusions of grandeur.

My Amarin docket is strictly limited to representing shareholders, derivatively on behalf of Amarin or otherwise. I would consider collaborating at arms-length with the new leadership and/or their lawyers if they ever reached out to collaborate on a project that would benefit shareholders, and there is no conflict.

But I do not anticipate such an invitation and harbor no delusions of grandeur.