I think that's the expectation, and I regard it as a good thing. The company still makes money on volume. There's no reason for rare-disease patients (or the government or insurers) to pay exorbitant amounts for a massively sold drug; and the company, in this case Anavex, still has the benefits of the rare pediatric disease voucher.
The company this development could hurt, it seems to me, is Acadia. Unless trofinetide has some great value compared to blarcamesine if they're alternatives (or has substantial impact above and beyond blarcamesine's if they're used together), Acadia would not be able to charge rare-disease prices, even though its drug could be sold only to a tiny market. (This assumes that trofinetide does not address any indications beyond Rett Syndrome; and that blarcamesine is approved for Rett plus some non-rare disease, like Alzheimer's or Parkinson's DD.)