Replies to post #134267 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[Lightning_Rod]

No need to respond to the arguments of the shorts. It is all fluff blowing in the wind.
Production runs means "it is happening" as ML has said before.
I haven't sold a share since we first engaged in communication and have only added on dips.
The same is true of anyone else I know.

Best to longs,

L_R

[squingeqbob]

Lewrock, I am also restricted to one post a day and I'm using it to say WELL SAID!

Shorts who have gone back to hiding under their respective rocks please feel free to come out and disagree.

[prototype_101]

worth another LQQk, Nothing makes short sellers more nervous than finding out that Lightwave Logic’s foundry partners are currently running PRODUCTION TRIALS. Why would they do that? “We” were convinced their technology would never scale and the fact that Lightwave Logic has never produced a product in 20 years was proof positive that they would never ever produce any revenue. We even talked to an ex employee who told us there were issues five years ago.

The worst news possible is learning about production runs because reaching that step means both parties want to produce and market this technology. In order to reach agreement on the terms of a license, both parties must be comfortable with the production economics. What level of upfront cash payment is appropriate? What percentage of gross modulator sales makes sense?

One thing is clear to me, the foundries want this technology and are already devoting machine time to be able to price the agreements. If I were short this stock, I would be fargin nervous as hell.

Note to board bears: since I am restricted to only one post per day, I will not be responding to your counter arguments.

[prototype_101]

worth another LQQk, Nothing makes short sellers more nervous than finding out that Lightwave Logic’s foundry partners are currently running PRODUCTION TRIALS. Why would they do that? “We” were convinced their technology would never scale and the fact that Lightwave Logic has never produced a product in 20 years was proof positive that they would never ever produce any revenue. We even talked to an ex employee who told us there were issues five years ago.

The worst news possible is learning about production runs because reaching that step means both parties want to produce and market this technology. In order to reach agreement on the terms of a license, both parties must be comfortable with the production economics. What level of upfront cash payment is appropriate? What percentage of gross modulator sales makes sense?

One thing is clear to me, the foundries want this technology and are already devoting machine time to be able to price the agreements. If I were short this stock, I would be fargin nervous as hell.

Note to board bears: since I am restricted to only one post per day, I will not be responding to your counter arguments.

ANY DAY NOW TO MAY 2023 ASM >>
LWLG - May 2022 ASM - 12 MONTH GOALS

>>>>>>> Licensing Agreement <<<<<<<

>>>>>>> Tech Transfer Agreement <<<<<<<

https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2023/3/2/ultxtScreenshot_20230302_075326_Adobe_Acrobat.jpg

50 trading days 20 million shares Shorted, or on average needing to Cover 400,000 shares EVERY DAY to mid-May ASM!!!
400,000 shares EVERY DAY!!!
400,000 shares EVERY DAY!!!
400,000 shares EVERY DAY!!!