Replies to post #288268 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

IRELLEVANT!

The JUDGE should have known not to make the ruling then. It's NOT Asher's fault that the ruling WAS made!

What...should Asher have put out a PR that said "Geez, sorry Judge, that ruling is incorrect. We cannot accept that ruling in place of DBMM SCREWING US OVER for money owed us."?

It's basically being said that Asher should not have PR'd the ruling because it was incorrect.

Talk to the JUDGE about it!

The Judge made the ruling, and it was FAIR GAME to be PR'd.

NOTHING FALSE ABOUT IT!

[Stock_Barber]

That has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with my post!

You claimed:

The PR referred to false civil action canceled for lack of disclosure of federal Consent Decree signed Oct 2016.

And I called bullshit on that!

So there is no link to prove that claim, eh?

Looks like I was correct... again!

[OTC Whisperer]

Exactly, thanks for sharing this again for those who haven’t been around that long.

[OTC Whisperer]

Exactly, thanks for sharing this $DBMM information again for those who haven’t been around that long.