Stoned or stupid I am not sure which applies here to management. If this reaches $.48 in my lifetime I will be shocked and might break even assuming volume allows for hundreds of thousands of shares to trade daily which also seems unlikely. I understand that we really don't own the land as the seller/owner is our bank and can take back the land if we default which without production seems a likely conclusion. Surely the FAT CAT REAL ESTATE INVESTOR knows this paper thin situation? Why bother to act like they needed the land so badly when they don't is beyond me. Land ($$ obligation) with no plan obviously scares most investors as evidenced by share price and volume. I'm guessing keeping your shareholders in the dark is not good for either of these. This is a mystery maybe someone can answer for me....Why did they buy the land they have no plans to utilize?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
