InvestorsHub Logo

boi568

02/11/23 2:45 PM

#402875 RE: scorman1 #402869

In the absence of a properly controlled and blinded trial, you can't establish any level of efficacy for Simulfilam.

williamssc

02/11/23 3:12 PM

#402877 RE: scorman1 #402869

SAVA trial is unblinded with no placebo control, this puts them years behind AVXL.

peeved

02/11/23 3:48 PM

#402882 RE: scorman1 #402869

This idea that trials out of the usa are not valid for fda approval has been

Debunked ad nauseum.

If you think a trial without placebo is more valid than an adequate trial outside the usa then you really need to stick with sava

Mikesc

02/11/23 5:26 PM

#402915 RE: scorman1 #402869

Welcome... did you know Anavex was a printing company?
Bullish
Bullish

Amatuer17

02/11/23 9:47 PM

#402937 RE: scorman1 #402869

Very good analysis - the question on whether the trial will be accepted in US - interesting angle

sab63090

02/12/23 7:26 AM

#402947 RE: scorman1 #402869

Excellent post and summary of where we are!

RedShoulder

02/13/23 11:51 AM

#403133 RE: scorman1 #402869

they can claim to be the second drug after simufilam that actually improved cognition in mild AD at one year, and puts them a head above Biogen and Lilly.



That is a false statement, the first trial that showed improved cognition was Anavex's Ph-2 trial with some super responders. That was many years ago, way before the simufilam unblinded open label with no placebo trial results.

Another fact that SAVA investors overlook is that simufilam is downstream from the S-1 receptor that will be brought into homeostasis with A2-73 Blarcamesine and properly fold proteins upstream; making simufilam redundant and not needed.