Replies to post #117079 on Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[Yolo]

Yes. He did it with Calasse, if you remember.

He originally argued that Calasse didn't exist and there was no proof of consideration.

But when that was challenged, he didn't provide evidence showing the books when the shares were issued or anything that would prove the shares were invalidly issued. Instead, his entire case became about actions Calasse took as CEO, which happened years after the original O'Flynn shares were issued.


While he argued that Calasse didn't earn the shares issued in the employment agreement, he never once argued that they were issued fraudulently. That is because that argument requires proof of extrinsic fraud, which Sharp does not possess.

So no, Sharp does not need actual evidence to file something.