![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/825603.png?cb=1676334670)
Thursday, February 09, 2023 10:21:00 AM
He originally argued that Calasse didn't exist and there was no proof of consideration.
But when that was challenged, he didn't provide evidence showing the books when the shares were issued or anything that would prove the shares were invalidly issued. Instead, his entire case became about actions Calasse took as CEO, which happened years after the original O'Flynn shares were issued.
While he argued that Calasse didn't earn the shares issued in the employment agreement, he never once argued that they were issued fraudulently. That is because that argument requires proof of extrinsic fraud, which Sharp does not possess.
So no, Sharp does not need actual evidence to file something.
If someone can't tell that a shell is a shell, can you trust anything else that they say?
Recent GVSI News
- Epazz, Inc. (OTC Pink: EPAZ) US Navy Collaboration ZenaDrone 1000 • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 11/09/2023 01:00:34 PM
- Epazz, Inc. (OTC Pink: EPAZ) US Navy Collaboration ZenaDrone 1000 Extreme Weather Demo • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 11/07/2023 12:29:43 PM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM