Replies to post #401058 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[nidan7500]

do the right thing

Why does the company keep doing this? At this point it would be better to just not announce any expected timelines. Just say results pending or something like that. I can't recall them ever hitting on one of these timelines. q2 2024 it is... Another year gone

IMO, the trial process is about projecting actions according to a set sequence of pre-planned activities and appropriately recording results according to plan, that part is pretty obvious. When conducted according to this protocol then expected completion dates are easily managed (like boiling water @sea level...works just about every time on schedule).

I could be wrong but what are they supposed to do when they see/find new important/critical facts previously unanticipated /planned for?? In my time as a lab rat doing tests/trials I was continuously learning or confirming stuff already known/expected. Every now and then I would see/smell/gather new info (contradictions even-call them, "WAKE UP SCREAMING MOMENTS" ) which needed to be verified-validated carefully. I called it a learning moment...new knowledge, and it/they need(s) to be understood in some context.

So, IMO, Dr.M. may want to set appropriate expectations on timing (w/in reason-considering the many/many unknown-unknowns in CNS BIO-MED space). He is (we -AVXL) are on the point-"The tip of the Spear", so to speak. Another observation I made after many years of interfacing w/such-science people WW..."German scientists ... DO NOT DO HELP WELL". It will be done when he says it's done (+ or -).