InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

want2retire

02/01/23 5:04 PM

#254004 RE: Deannie #254003

“We’ve already learned that KBLB PRs mean little, so no, the snarky quote above isn’t what’s at issue per se, though I’m surprised none of those points mentioned seemingly aren’t of concern to you. What we CAN trust (unless Kim is willing to lie on legal documents) are the Q reports that will hopefully one day show revenue. Until that time comes, it doesn’t matter how many positive PRs Kim issues IF they’re accompanied by zeros on the accompanying Q reports. Kim’s PRs have proven to be largely meaningless and serve only to deceive folks into staying on the hook. Revenue (and huge, lasting pps movement) or bust (the dilution solution) is where KBLB is headed. Time will”

This is a long way of saying the same thing I said. No matter what anyone writes here you will not believe/accept it. Now we are adding PRs to things that can’t be believed/trusted.

What is the point of continually asking others for proof if the only proof you will accept is a quarterly filing? It does not matter, to you, what anyone else says, feels or may even validate because you’ll only trust a quarterly filing. Yet you keep asking and then wonder why no one will answer your questions, knowing you won’t accept their responses anyway. Odd that no one wants to play.

Same point as I made, just written out long form with a bunch of needless filler.

icon url

SilkRoad

02/01/23 10:46 PM

#254017 RE: Deannie #254003

Until KBLB achieves metric tonnage, their PR’s are about nothing.