Replies to post #254004 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[Deannie]

“No matter what anyone writes here you will not believe/accept it.”

Not true. If it’s PLAUSIBLE, I’d be inclined to consider it. Still, including your most recent post no plausible explanation has yet been offered, including one from the OP.

“Now we are adding PRs to things that can’t be believed/trusted.”

No, I’m not adding anything to the list that didn’t earn its spot there in the first place. Vaguely worded and open ended PRs are quite simply deceptive in that they’re designed to suggest or imply (positive things) without revealing hard facts that shareholders want and deserve.
*******Shame on Kim, and for those considering the purchase of KBLB shares, PLEASE read all the PRs, review the Q reports and read as many posts on this board as you can.

[DimesForShares]

I suspect many of us appreciate a well-reasoned defense of a company many of us are invested in. Unfortunately, what we get are wild inferences based on ambiguous data. In times past, such inferences have proven false time and again, as have the suggestive statements made by KBLB.

When people continue to promote these wild inferences, in spite of a reasonable counter-argument, some of us continue to challenge these wild inferences.

Somewhat to my surprise, Mojo has mounted some of the strongest defenses of KBLB. He was critical for many years, but has changed his tune. He hasn’t convinced me, but having people talk about many different production sites, stockpiling silk, soon soon soon … well that tends to dilute his case rather than strengthening it.