The problem with removing Peter is that in a roundabout way he was pretty much hand selected by the original Marker owners and NEA. While they can obviously have a change of heart, and probably should put their emotions aside, they seem to have an attachment to him.
Peter, John Wilson, and Juan Vera all sit on the board and I have to assume that none of them would put forth a proposal to oust Peter. Any proposal would then need the approval of all four remaining board members. From those remaining people the only one I could potentially see as even considering it would be Steve Elms as he has the most at stake. The rest are probably just as complicit as management.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
