Thanks for that repost, sokol. Seems many here need to be reminded of the factual data and how more advanced with AD, at baseline, the blarcamesine patients were than lecanemab patients.
A very glaring point made by the author seems to slide by the doubters...
How many times does the Amyloid thesis (AD treatment) have to produce inconclusive or failed results before FDA declares it a missed approach and ultimately grounds the effort for good?
Many thanks to sokol, Mayo, and boi for their insights today.
As an aside: Knowing the headwinds Anavex would face with its revolutionary drug(s), Missling never claimed the Company/he would be transparent with results. This may have been too subtle for some, though he warned us when he stated (paraphrasing):