Nicely summarized and it is clear that there is great potential in the battery Coretec is developing, but ‘cost effectiveness is going to have a big say in how competitive the Endurion battery becomes. And it is more complicated than simply saying that if CHS is more costly than other silanes, that the Endurion battery is then out of the running. If a 50 pound Endurion battery pack performs as well as the competitors 100 pound battery pack then theoretically the Endurion battery can have a price point which is double the competition, and then Endurion still wins because it weighs only half as much which is a critical metric in an EV. What is that worth? That's just an example, but these simply are things we don’t know and until some stats and comparisons are available or possible to make it is to some degree still a crap shoot.
Back to the CEA and Eindhoven – yes they have shown the superiority of CHS in several categories, but again the cost of this superiority is not discussed and that’s going to have significant impact on what is marketable or economically feasible and whether there is a rush to adopt new manufacturing methods employing CHS.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
