Why do you say ‘post hoc’ when it clearly says in the publication “This is the first SAP that has been submitted for the Trial, and it is being submitted prior to Data Lock and unblinding of the study results.” What does ‘post hoc’ mean to you?
I posted a reply to his tweet that it was "actually, not peer reviewed." So far, 269 views and 7 likes. :). Would be nice if Carlo or Toms posted that.
van den Bent's article described by Feuerstein as "peer reviewed" is to be found in "Neuro-Oncology" here. Its journal citation is an "editorial", specifically the Editor's Choice; ie not a peer-reviewed article.