beating a dead horse
Posted by: FogOfWar
In reply to: jagvik12 who wrote msg# 12240 Date: 5/30/2006 4:38:42 PM
Post #
We're certainly not beating a dead horse, this doesn't look dead to me at all.
Anyone think this is dead?
Posted by: jagvik12
In reply to: jonesie54 who wrote msg# 12239 Date:5/30/2006 3:57:24 PM
Post #of 20902
Your assumption is correct. As for "blatant false pumping," obviously that will not be tolerated. But, for the record, I am a current member of HSM, and the majority of the posts are supported in one way or another in my unbiased opinion. The occasional "dreamer" post that may slide over there, under these rules, will not be tolerated unless supported. As for Downs' history, I'll dig up some fellow traders viewpoint on that issue, post it, and the issue will have been addressed, not needed to be brought up again by the same people. This is where the topic of bashing will not be tolerated, make your point once, there's no need to beat a dead horse.
Posted by: bol23123
In reply to: Investorman who wrote msg# 12315 Date:6/1/2006 10:44:34 AM
Post #of 20902
My point is if you don't own shares of this company. Why on earth are you still here bashing away. You've made your point numerous times that Downs and IDS is a big scam. I did okay in school, so I don't need to be told the same stuff over and over. The horse is already dead, stop beating it. Move on to the next scam.
Posted by: crossbow
In reply to: WV Hillbilly who wrote msg# 7293 Date:1/25/2006 2:47:06 PM
Post #of 20903
It appears that if IDWD is as bad as explained here, why would anyone keep track of IDWD? If you sold because you didn't like the company, fine. But why hang around to continue beating what you consider a "Dead Horse"? I still have shares in IDWD, but I have other things to do besides constantly posting good or bad messages on this board. I have no idea if IDWD is worth the current price as all of these stocks are a gamble. But, I will hang on because I think a darkhorse sometimes finishes in the money!