Replies to post #16856 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[gollem]

Maybe. But that also gives Intel more time before they have to knife Itanium, and reduces the pressure, if it exists, to adopt x86-64.

Do we want them to kill Itanium just yet? I'm not sure about that. AMD is trying to create a picture that you need 64 bits to play in the major league, all 32 bits is value, including Intels offerings.

[blauboad]

But that also gives Intel more time before they have to knife Itanium, and reduces the pressure, if it exists, to adopt x86-64.

It could also be that AMDs (alleged) release of a 32bit K8 is a sign that they don't need to push the porting issue, i.e. that Intel will be supporting AMD64 in the near future. I don't know if I believe that, but it's a possibility.