InvestorsHub Logo

LBSR TO DA MOON

12/06/22 2:55 PM

#389968 RE: FitzyP33 #389960

Was your use of the "periods" in your sentence below for the purpose of creating an even more dramatic effect? WOW, very powerful! Geez, I'm actually thinking of reducing my holdings since it just might take a veeeeeeerrrrrryyyyy loooooooonnnnnnnggggg tiiiiiiimmmmmmeeeee...

It's not going to happen again for a very. long. time.

Steady_T

12/06/22 3:22 PM

#389983 RE: FitzyP33 #389960

Your logic is flawed. The anavex NDA will be put to an advisory committee like Aduhelm was. The difference is that the Advisory committee will vote 10 to 1 for approval unlike the 10 to 1abstain for rejection that Aduhelm got.

The vote in favor of the 2-73 approval from the committee will give the FDA all the CYA it's wounded bureaucracy needs to approve.

ahp123

12/06/22 3:32 PM

#389989 RE: FitzyP33 #389960

there is a big difference that means everything in this context ... our drug is safe.
If data is as good, with 50 mg dose, as we hope for, then even a corrupt FDA can't avoid at least giving a conditional approval