InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

VikingInvest

12/06/22 12:14 PM

#544618 RE: exwannabe #544614

That's not quite true. The MHRA did allow the PIP trial design to be the same as the final SAP for DCVax-L phase III. That would not have happened if they had not felt that the trial design was acceptable for approval. You are somewhat right that we have yet to hear from other 3 RA's, though the FDA has signaled that ECA's is the way forward for these kind of trials.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

hoffmann6383

12/06/22 12:35 PM

#544633 RE: exwannabe #544614

No RA has said that the changed trial protocol is valid for the purpose of approval.



Misleading. MHRA explicitly approved the trial protocol by green lighting a pediatric trial using the same SAP and the FDA implicitly approved the design by Finalizing their guidance on ECAs.

Have a great one buddy! by.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Dr Bala

12/06/22 12:40 PM

#544637 RE: exwannabe #544614

Moving the goal posts now to approval speculations. Can't get any better than this. Hahahaha.